4.2 Article

Consequences of transfusion of platelet antibody: a case report and literature review

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 1981-1989

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01796.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of platelet (PLT) antibody by blood transfusion can lead to severe thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and an acute transfusion reaction. CASE REPORT. A 49-year-old male on warfarin developed thrombocytopenic bleeding within 2 hours of transfusion with a single unit of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP). The patient's PLT count on admission was 122 x 109 per L. Two hours after transfusion, PLT count has decreased to 5 x 109 per L. The patient's PLT antibody screen by solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was negative and his genotype was HPA-1a/1b. The donor's genotype was HPA-1b/1b and antibody screen revealed anti-HPA-1a. A lookback investigation identified another case of severe thrombocytopenia after FFP infusion 4 years previously. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: A literature review identified 19 cases of passive transfer of PLT antibody that resulted in thrombocytopenia. The PLT nadir of 7 x 101 per L was reached within 6 hours after transfusion with a median time to PLT recovery of 5 days. Transfusion was accompanied by an acute transfusion reaction in 30 percent of recipients. Approximately 75 percent of recipients developed thrombocytopenic bleeding. All cases involved a female donor with a history of pregnancy. High-plasma-volume components accounted for the majority of cases while anti-HPA-1a was the most frequently implicated antibody. CONCLUSION: Unexplained posttransfusion thrombocytopenia should be investigated to rule out passive transfer of PLT antibodies. Implicated donors should be deferred from subsequent donations. Switching to predominantly male plasma for transfusion may lead to reduction in cases of thrombocytopenia due to passive transfer of PLT antibody. Rational use of blood products may further reduce incidence of this complication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据