4.2 Article

Effects comparison between low glycemic index diets and high glycemic index diets on HbA1c and fructosamine for patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 362-369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.10.008

关键词

Glycemic index; Diabetes; Meta-analysis; HbA1c; Fructosamine; Comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of low glycemic index (GI) through the comparison of low-GI foods group and high-GI foods group on glycemic control (the measurements were HbA1c and fructosamine) for patients with diabetes. Methods: The studies were retrieved from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Cochrane Library and Google scholar from their inception to August 2014. Review Manager 5.1 and STATA package v.11.0 software were applied for the metaanalysis. Standard mean difference (5WD) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for HbA1c and fructosamine of patients with diabetes were collected and calculated in a fixed or random effects model when appropriate. Subgroup analysis stratified by study design, geographic area of participants and types of diabetes were also conducted. Results: There were significant differences of overall effects on HbA1c between low-GI foods group and high-GI foods group (SWD = -0.42, 95%CI -0.69 to -0.16, P<0.01) in patients with diabetes, and the subgroup analysis indicated that significant differences of HbA1c were also found between the two groups in crossover study, in Australian population and American population, as well as in type 2 diabetes. The overall fructosamine was also significantly different in patients with diabetes between low-GI foods and high-GI foods group (SMD = -0.44, 95%CI = -0.82 to -0.06, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our results suggest that low-GI diets achieve a more beneficial effect on glycemic control than that of high-GI foods diets. (C) 2014 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据