4.1 Article

Habitat use and movement patterns of brook trout in Nipigon Bay, Lake Superior

期刊

TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 4, 页码 1203-1212

出版社

AMER FISHERIES SOC
DOI: 10.1577/T05-273.1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis are one of two salmonine species native to Lake Superior. Abundant and widely distributed a century ago, Lake Superior's brook trout (coasters) have been reduced to a few remnant stocks, probably as a result of exploitation and habitat loss. Twenty brook trout captured in Nipigon Bay, Lake Superior, were surgically implanted with radio transmitters and were located from June 1999 to October 2000. Brook trout locations were used to determine the characteristics of utilized lake habitat and to identify streams used for spawning and the spawning areas within them. These locations were also used to establish daily and seasonal movement patterns. A total of 638 locations were obtained during the tracking period, 483 occurring within Nipigon Bay and the remaining 155 within tributaries. Brook trout were located almost exclusively within the shallow nearshore areas of Nipigon Bay; 92% of the locations were less than 7 to deep and 94% were less than 400 m from shore. Brook trout occupied deeper areas with steeper shoreline slopes during July and August, when the water temperatures of shallow nearshore areas were at their highest. Following selected individuals for 24-h periods revealed that brook trout often used deeper areas during daylight hours and moved to extremely shallow nearshore areas during the night. Radio-tagged brook trout began ascending tributaries during late summer in both years of this study. The mean residency time for brook trout in tributaries was 46 d. Spawning occurred in early October, and most radio-tagged brook trout returned to Lake Superior by mid-October. Four different streams were used during the spawning period. Brook trout entering streams exhibited strong spawning site fidelity between years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据