4.3 Article

Headache After Traumatic Brain Injury: A National Survey of Clinical Practices and Treatment Approaches

期刊

PM&R
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 3-8

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mayo Clinic NIDRR TBI Model System Center grant [H133A070013]
  2. Moss Rehab NIDRR TBI Model System Center grant [H133A120037]
  3. University of Washington NIDRR TBI Model System Center grant [H133A070032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Individuals with headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties. Objective: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI. Design: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20-item questionnaire developed by the authors. Participants: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list survey of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260). Methods: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by 2 biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physicians' clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments prescribed; and headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI. Results: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification, and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics, whereas a nonpharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported. Conclusion: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent effective care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据