4.4 Article

Role of Plasmepsin V in Export of Diverse Protein Families from the Plasmodium falciparum Exportome

期刊

TRAFFIC
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 532-550

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tra.12053

关键词

effector; export; malaria; PEXEL; Plasmepsin V; PNEP; trafficking

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Ramaciotti Foundation [3197/2010]
  3. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  4. Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS
  5. Australian Research Council QEII Fellow
  6. Howard Hughes International Scholar and an Australia Fellow of the NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium falciparum exports several hundred effector proteins that remodel the host erythrocyte and enable parasites to acquire nutrients, sequester in the circulation and evade immune responses. The majority of exported proteins contain the Plasmodium export element (PEXEL; RxLxE/Q/D) in their N-terminus, which is proteolytically cleaved in the parasite endoplasmic reticulum by Plasmepsin V, and is necessary for export. Several exported proteins lack a PEXEL or contain noncanonical motifs. Here, we assessed whether Plasmepsin V could process the N-termini of diverse protein families in P. falciparum. We show that Plasmepsin V cleaves N-terminal sequences from RIFIN, STEVOR and RESA multigene families, the latter of which contain a relaxed PEXEL (RxLxxE). However, Plasmepsin V does not cleave the N-terminal sequence of the major exported virulence factor erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) or the PEXEL-negative exported proteins SBP-1 or REX-2. We probed the substrate specificity of Plasmepsin V and determined that lysine at the PEXEL P3 position, which is present in PfEMP1 and other putatively exported proteins, blocks Plasmepsin V activity. Furthermore, isoleucine at position P1 also blocked Plasmepsin V activity. The specificity of Plasmepsin V is therefore exquisitely confined and we have used this novel information to redefine the predicted P. falciparum PEXEL exportome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据