4.4 Article

In situ Measurement of the Electrical Potential Across the Lysosomal Membrane Using FRET

期刊

TRAFFIC
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 972-982

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01215.x

关键词

electrical potential; FRET; lysosome; proton-motive force

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP4665]
  2. Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  3. Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation
  4. MacLaughlin Centre for Molecular Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The progressive acidification of the endocytic pathway is generated by H+ pumping of electrogenic vacuolar-type ATPases (V-ATPases) on the endosomal/lysosomal membrane. The determinants of pH during endosome maturation are not completely understood, but the permeability to ions that neutralize the electrogenic effect of the V-ATPase has been proposed to play a central role. If counter-ion conductance becomes limiting, the generation of a large membrane potential would dominate the proton-motive force (pmf), diminishing the pH gradient proportionally. Validation of this notion requires direct measurement of the electrical potential that develops across the endosomal/lysosomal membrane. To date, the measurement of lysosomal membrane potential (psi(phi)) in situ has been hampered by the inability to access endosomes by electrophysiological means and the fact that individual organelles cannot be discerned when using potentiometric fluorescent dyes. Here, we describe a noninvasive procedure to estimate psi(phi) in intact cells, based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). At steady state, psi(phi) averaged 19 mV (lumen positive) and was only partially dissipated by inhibition of the V-ATPase with concanamycin A (CcA). psi(phi) was considerably increased by alkalinization of the lysosome lumen by NH4Cl, implying that at steady state the V-ATPase operates at submaximal rates and that the contribution of psi(phi) to pmf is relatively small. Our method should enable systematic studies of endosomal/lysosomal potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据