4.4 Article

Localization and Trafficking of an Isoform of the AtPRA1 Family to the Golgi Apparatus Depend on Both N- and C-Terminal Sequence Motifs

期刊

TRAFFIC
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 185-200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01140.x

关键词

AtPRA1 isoform; ER exit signals; Golgi apparatus; trafficking and localization

资金

  1. Crop Functional Genomics Research Center [CG1123-1]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) [20100000737]
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  4. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea [609004-05-2-SB210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prenylated Rab acceptors (PRAs) bind to prenylated Rab proteins and possibly aid in targeting Rabs to their respective compartments. In Arabidopsis, 19 isoforms of PRA1 have been identified and, depending upon the isoforms, they localize to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus and endosomes. Here, we investigated the localization and trafficking of AtPRA1.B6, an isoform of the Arabidopsis PRA1 family. In colocalization experiments with various organellar markers, AtPRA1.B6 tagged with hemagglutinin (HA) at the N-terminus localized to the Golgi apparatus in protoplasts and transgenic plants. The valine residue at the C-terminal end and an EEE motif in the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain were critical for anterograde trafficking from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. The N-terminal region contained a sequence motif for retention of AtPRA1.B6 at the Golgi apparatus. In addition, anterograde trafficking of AtPRA1.B6 from the ER to the Golgi apparatus was highly sensitive to the HA:AtPRA1.B6 level. The region that contains the sequence motif for Golgi retention also conferred the abundance-dependent trafficking inhibition. On the basis of these results, we propose that AtPRA1.B6 localizes to the Golgi apparatus and its ER-to-Golgi trafficking and localization to the Golgi apparatus are regulated by multiple sequence motifs in both the C- and N-terminal cytoplasmic domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据