4.7 Review

Review of nanomaterials as sorbents in solid-phase extraction for environmental samples

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 347-369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.009

关键词

Nanomaterials; Sample preparation; Solid phase extraction; Microextraction; Organic pollutants

资金

  1. R&D Center for Green Patrol Technologies through the R&D for Global Top Environmental Technologies - Ministry of Environment (MOE)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2016R1E1A1A01940995]
  3. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2015001950001]
  4. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ012521032018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthropogenic organic contaminants (AOCs) are found to exert significant impacts on the human ecosystem, even at low or trace-level concentrations. To meet the growing demand for their quantitation in diverse environmental media, the use of preconcentration approaches (such as solid phase extraction) has become an essential component to practically upgrade both procedural efficiency and the analytical sensitivity. Nanomaterials (NMs) are realized as excellent candidates for proper sorption media because of their unique structural and surface properties with noticeably enhanced sorption capability towards contaminants. This review explores the use of various NMs (metallic and mixed oxide nanoparticles (NPs), carbon NMs (fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and graphene oxide), polymer-based nanocomposites (organic polymers, inorganic and hybrid polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers, and dendrimers), and silicon/magnetic NPs) as potential sorbents for analytical applications. In this review, the distinctive features of NM-based sorptive extraction techniques are examined comprehensively with the discussion on their future prospects and key challenges. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据