期刊
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1316-1325出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2010.09.004
关键词
Alternative method; Antibody; Identification; Marine toxin; Phycotoxin; Receptor; Relative toxicity; Target; Toxicity; Toxic Equivalency Factor
资金
- Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Spain [AGL2007-60946/ALI, SAF2009-12581, AGL2009-13581-CO2-01]
- Xunta de Galicia, Spain [GRC 30/2006, PGIDT07CSA012261PR, PGDIT 07MMA006261PR, 2009/XA044, 2008/CP389]
- EU [FOOD-CT-2004-06988, CRP 030270-2, 211326 - CP, STC-CP2008-1-555612, 2009-1/117]
The need to have methods as alternatives to animal bioassays for marine-toxin detection is of paramount importance. Such methods require not only identification of each of the analogs in a phycotoxin group but also the toxicity of each analog. Depending on the nature of the method, not all that have been proposed as potential replacements are equally suitable for the task. The evidence suggests that physico-chemical methods are by far the most prone to generating larger errors. Antibody-based methods in many cases exhibit the same difficulties, whilst receptor-based methods have been developed to measure the concentrations of toxin present in samples based on the relative toxicity of all analogs. This review identifies the advantages and the disadvantages of each type of method, with particular emphasis on toxicity identification. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据