4.4 Article

In vitro myelotoxicity assessment of the emerging mycotoxins Beauvericin, Enniatin b and Moniliformin on human hematopoietic progenitors

期刊

TOXICON
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 182-191

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.11.006

关键词

Myelotoxicity; Human hematopoietic progenitors; Emerging mycotoxins; Beauvericin; Enniatin b; Moniliformin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to screen potential myelotoxicity of the emerging mycotoxins Beauvericin, Enniatin b and Moniliformin using human hematopoietic progenitor clonogenic assays. Depending on mycotoxins, inhibitory effects on proliferation of white blood cells progenitors (CFU-GM), platelet progenitors (CFU-MK) and red blood cells progenitors (BFU-E) have been detected at various concentrations. Beauvericin was cytotoxic at 32 AM, 3.2 mu M and 6.4 mu M, had no effect on proliferation in the presence of 0.032 mu M, 0.16 mu M and 0.064 mu M, and the IC50 was equal to 3.4 mu M, 0.7 mu M and 3.7 mu M for CFU-GM, CFU-MK and BFU-E, respectively. Enniatin b was cytotoxic at 6 mu M, 1.8 mu M and 5 mu M, had no effect on proliferation in the presence of 1 mu M, 1.1 mu M and 1.2 mu M and the IC50 was equal to 4.4 mu M, 1.3 mu M and 3.3 mu M for CFU-GM, CFU-MK and BFU-E, respectively. Moniliformin was not cytotoxic at tested concentrations for CFU-GM and CFU-MK and cytotoxic at 10 mu M for BFU-E, had no effect on proliferation in the presence of 5 mu M, 0.1 mu M and 0.1 mu M and the IC50 was equal to 31 mu M, 39 mu M and 4.1 mu M for CFU-GM, CFU-MK and BFU-E, respectively. Inhibition of the BFU-E differentiation has been observed in the presence of Enniatin b or Moniliformin. For the three mycotoxins, variation of distribution of CFU-MK colonies according to their size has been observed. These in vitro effects may be responsible for in vivo hematological troubles in case of consumption of contaminated commodities. In vivo studies have to be performed to test this hypothesis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据