4.4 Article

Study of possible combined toxic effects of azaspiracid-1 and okadaic acid in mice via the oral route

期刊

TOXICON
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 895-906

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.06.007

关键词

Azaspiracid; Okadaic acid; Toxicity

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council (NFR) [172561/S40]
  2. Marine Institute, Ireland [ST/02/02]
  3. ASTOX2-project
  4. Marine Institute
  5. Marine Research Sub-Programme of the National Development Plan
  6. European Regional Development Fund
  7. Ifremer from the French Ministry of Education, Research and Technology [187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxins from the okadaic acid (OA) and azaspiracid(AZA) group cause considerable negative health effects in consumers when present in shellfish above certain levels. The main symptoms, dominated by diarrhoea, are caused by damage to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Event though OA and AZAs exert toxicity via different mechanisms, it is important to find out whether they may enhance the health effects if present together since they act on the same organs and are regulated individually. In this study, the main issue was the possibility of enhanced lethality in mice upon combined oral exposure to OA and AZA1. In additional, pathological effects in several organs and effects on absorption from the GI tract were studied. Although the number of mice was small due to low availability of AZA1, the results indicate no additive or synergistic effect on lethality when AZA1 and OA were given together. Similar lack of increased toxicity was observed concerning pathological effects that were restricted to the GI-tract. OA and AZA1 were absorbed from the GI-tract to a very low degree, and when given together, uptake was reduced. Taken together, these results indicate that the present practice of regulating toxins from the OA and AZA group individually does not present and unwanted increased risk for consumers of shellfish. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据