4.5 Article

Metabolism of the masked mycotoxin deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside in pigs

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 229, 期 1, 页码 190-197

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.06.032

关键词

Conjugated mycotoxins; ADME

资金

  1. Lower Austrian Government
  2. Vienna Science and Technology Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants can metabolize the Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) by forming the masked mycotoxin deoxynivalenol-3-b-D-glucoside (D3G). D3G might be cleaved during digestion, thus increasing the total DON burden of an individual. Due to a lack of in vivo data, D3G has not been included in the various regulatory limits established for DON so far. The aim of our study was to contribute to the risk assessment of D3G by determination of its metabolism in pigs. Four piglets received water, D3G (116 mg/kg b. w.) and the equimolar amount of DON (75 mg/kg b. w.) by gavage on day 1, 5 and 9 of the experiment, respectively. Additionally, 15.5 mg D3G/kg b. w. were administered intravenously on day 13. Urine and feces were collected for 24 h and analyzed for DON, D3G, deoxynivalenol-3-glucuronide (DON-3-GlcA), deoxynivalenol-15-GlcA (DON-15-GlcA) and deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM-1) by UHPLC-MS/ MS. After oral application of DON and D3G, in total 84.8 +/- 9.7% and 40.3 +/- 8.5% of the given dose were detected in urine, respectively. The majority of orally administered D3G was excreted in form of DON, DON-15-GlcA, DOM-1 and DON-3-GlcA, while urinary D3G accounted for only 2.6 +/- 1.4%. In feces, just trace amounts of metabolites were found. Intravenously administered D3G was almost exclusively excreted in unmetabolized form via urine. Data indicate that D3G is nearly completely hydrolyzed in the intestinal tract of pigs, while the toxin seems to be rather stable after systemic absorption. Compared to DON, the oral bioavailability of D3G and its metabolites seems to be reduced by a factor of up to 2, approximately. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据