4.5 Article

Differential mechanisms of action are involved in chlorpyrifos effects in estrogen-dependent or -independent breast cancer cells exposed to low or high concentrations of the pesticide

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 213, 期 2, 页码 184-193

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.06.017

关键词

Chlorpyrifos; Cell proliferation; Endocrine disruptors; Cell death; Breast cancer cells

资金

  1. National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion [PICT RED 0214]
  2. National Council of Scientific and Technological Research [CONICET] [PIP 6060]
  3. University of Buenos Aires [UBACYT 20020100100983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has reported that many environmental compounds may display estrogenic actions and these findings led to researchers to associate breast cancer risk with the use of some pesticides. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of chlorpyrifos (CPF) on cell proliferation and the ER alpha-dependence of this action employing MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. We have also analyzed CPF action on the cell cycle distribution and the cyclins that are implicated in G1-S and intra-S checkpoints. Finally, the action on cell death and ROS production were studied. We demonstrated the ability of CPF 0.05 mu M to induce cell proliferation through ER alpha in hormone-dependent breast cancer cells. In contrast, CPF 50 mu M induces intra-S arrest modifying checkpoints proteins, through a mechanism that may involve changes in redox balance in MCF-7. In MDA-MB-231, we have found that CPF 50 mu M produces an arrest in G2/M phase which could be related to the capacity of the pesticide for binding to tubulin sites altering microtubules polymerization. Altogether, our results provide new evidences on the action of the pesticide CPF as an environmental breast cancer risk factor due to the effects that causes on the mechanisms that modulate breast cell proliferation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据