4.5 Article

Comparative protein profile of human hepatoma HepG2 cells treated with graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes: An iTRAQ-coupled 2D LC-MS/MS proteome analysis

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 207, 期 3, 页码 213-221

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.09.014

关键词

Cytotoxicity; Single-walled carbon nanotubes; Graphene; Proteome analysis; Oxidative stress; Apoptosis

资金

  1. School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphitic nanomaterials are promising candidates for applications in electronics, energy, materials and biomedical areas. Nevertheless, few detailed studies related to the mechanistic understanding of these nanomaterials with the living systems have been performed to date. In the present study, our group applied the iTRAQ-coupled 20 LC-MS/MS approach to analyze the protein profile change of human hepatoma HepG2 cells treated with graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), with the purpose of characterizing the interactions between living system and these nanomaterials at molecular level. Overall 37 differentially expressed proteins involved in metabolic pathway, redox regulation, cytoskeleton formation and cell growth were identified. Based on the protein profile, we found SWCNTs severely interfered the intracellular metabolic routes, protein synthesis and cytoskeletal systems. Moreover, our data suggested that SWCNTs might induce oxidative stress, thereby activating p53-mediated DNA damage checkpoint signals and leading to apoptosis. However, only moderate variation of protein levels for the cells treated with graphene was observed, which indicated graphene was less toxic and might be promising candidate for biomedical applications. We envision that this systematic characterization of cellular response at protein expression level will be of great importance to evaluate biocompatibility of nanomaterials. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据