4.5 Article

DNA damaging potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles in human epidermal cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 185, 期 3, 页码 211-218

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.01.008

关键词

Zinc oxide; Nanoparticles; Cytotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Human epidermal cells; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI) [SA 07-067]
  2. Suprainstitutional Project [SIP-08]
  3. Network Project [NWP-35]
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (New Delhi)
  5. University Grants Commission (New Delhi)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At present, more than 20 countries worldwide are manufacturing and marketing different varieties of nanotech-based consumer products of which cosmetics form the largest category. Due to the extremely small size of the nanoparticles (NPs) being used, there is a concern that they may interact directly with macromolecules such as DNA. The present study was aimed to assess the genotoxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs, one of the widely used ingredients of cosmetics, and other dermatological preparations in human epidermal cell line (A431). A reduction in cell viability as a function of both NP concentration as well as exposure time was observed. ZnO NPs demonstrated a DNA damaging potential as evident from an increased Olive tail moment (OTM) of 2.13 +/- 0.12 (0.8 mu g/ml) compared to control 1.37 +/- 0.12 in the Comet assay after an exposure of 6 h. ZnO NPs were also found to induce oxidative stress in cells indicated by depletion of glutathione (59% and 51%); catalase (64% and 55%) and superoxide dismutase (72% and 75%) at 0.8 and 0.08 mu g/ml respectively. Our data demonstrates that ZnO NPs even at low concentrations possess a genotoxic potential in human epidermal cells which may be mediated through lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Hence, caution should be taken in their use in dermatological preparations as well as while handling. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据