4.5 Article

Lead-induced ER calcium release and inhibitory effects of methionine choline in cultured rat hippocampal neurons

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 387-395

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.06.019

关键词

Lead; Calcium; Endoplasmic reticulum; Methionine; Choline

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30960324, 30760211, 81273120, 21267017]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2009GZY0138]
  3. Research Project of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Education Department [2007110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead, a ubiquitous neurotoxicant, can result in learning and memory dysfunction. Long term potentiation in the hippocampus, a potential neural substrate for learning and memory, is thought to be linked to calcium-triggered intracellular events. In this study, laser scanning confocal microscopy was used to examine the effects of Pb2+ on intracellular and endoplasmic reticulum free calcium concentration ([Ca2+](i) and [Ca2+](ER)) in cultured neonatal rat hippocampal neurons and their possible antagonism by methionine choline; understanding these effects would help explain the lead-induced cognitive and learning dysfunction and explore efficient safety and relief strategies. The results showed that Pb2+ increased [Ca2+](i) and decreased [Ca2+](ER) linearly in a time- and concentration-dependant manner, and Pb2+ addition after the applying of a ryanodine receptor (RyR) antagonist and an inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) antagonist did not increase [Ca2+](i). The addition of 10, 20, or 40 mmol/L methionine choline simultaneously with addition of 10 mu mol/L Pb2+ decreased [Ca2+](i) in Ca2+-free culture medium by 39.0%, 66.0%, and 61.6%, respectively, in a concentration-dependant manner in a certain dose range. Our results suggest that Pb2+ induces ER calcium release to increase the resting [Ca2+](i); and methionine choline inhibit this increase in [Ca2+](i). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据