4.5 Article

Reduced in vitro toxicity of fine particulate matter collected during the 2008 summer Olympic Games in Beijing: The roles of chemical and biological components

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2084-2093

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.08.004

关键词

2008 Olympic Games; PM2.5; Cytotoxicity; Cytokine/chemokine; Inflammation; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Committee of China [20637020]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2008AA062503]
  3. Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen [FE-75031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beijing has implemented systematic air pollution control legislation to reduce particulate emissions and improve air quality during the 2008 Summer Olympics, but whether the toxicity of fine fraction of particles (PM2.5) would be changed remains unclear. In present study we compared in vitro biological responses of PM2.5 collected before and during the Olympics and tried to reveal possible correlations between its chemical components and toxicological mechanism(s). We measured cytotoxicity, cytokines/chemokines, and related gene expressions in murine alveolar macrophages, MH-S, after treated with 20 PM2.5 samples. Significant, dose-dependent effects on cell viability, cytokine/chemokine release and mRNA expressions were observed. The cytotoxicity caused at equal mass concentration of PM2.5 was notably reduced (p < 0.05) by control measures, and significant association was found for viability and elemental zinc in PM2.5. Endotoxin content in PM2.5 correlated with all of the eight detected cytokines/chemokines; elemental and organic carbon correlated with four; arsenic and chromium correlated with six and three, respectively; iron and barium showed associations with two; nickel, magnesium, potassium, and calcium showed associations with one. PM2.5 toxicity in Beijing was substantially dependent on its chemical components, and lowering the levels of specific components in PM2.5 during the 2008 Olympics resulted in reduced biological responses. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据