4.5 Article

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and neuregulin (Neu) activation in human airway epithelial cells exposed to nickel acetate

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 280-287

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.12.012

关键词

Nickel; Epidermal growth factor; Apoptosis; Airway epithelial cells

资金

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention - ISPESL (Italy) [B01-DML-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel compounds are potential carcinogenic agents that produce a range of biological effects, including inhibition of cell death. Because suppression of apoptosis is thought to contribute to the initiation of carcinogenesis, we investigated the effects of nickel acetate (Ni2+) treatment on apoptosis in two different airway epithelial cell lines (A549 and Beas-2B, respectively). Furthermore, since both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and neuregulin (Neu) are involved in neoplastic development, mRNAs and expression levels of total and phosphorylated proteins (p-EGFR(TYr1173) and p-Neu(Tyr1248). respectively) were also measured. We found that exposure of A549 cells to Ni2+ resulted in significantly reduced cell viability, as well as increased apoptosis and DNA fragmentation at relatively low concentrations (0.1 and 0.5 mM) after 24 and 48 h. These changes were accompanied by reduced EGFR and Neu mRNAs and proteins, phosphorylated proteins as well as decreased Bcl-2 and increased BAX protein expression. Conversely, Beas-2B cells exposed to equivalent concentrations of Ni2+ did not show evident signs of apoptosis and DNA damage, hence showing increased expression and phosphorylation of both EGFR and Neu, increased Bcl-2 and reduced BAX expression. Altogether, our finding indicate that Ni2+ exposure differently affects apoptosis initiation either in non-tumorigenic (Beas-2B) and tumorigenic airway epithelial cells (A549), suggesting a potential involvement of EGFR/Neu receptors. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据