4.5 Article

Aristolochic acid I induced oxidative DNA damage associated with glutathione depletion and ERK1/2 activation in human cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 810-816

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.01.016

关键词

Aristolochic acid; Oxidative stress; DNA damage; GSH depletion; ERK1/2 activation

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC 96-2313-B- 040-004-MY3]
  2. National Science Council
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. Chung Shan Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aristolochic acid I (AAI) has been widely found in herbal remedies and linked to the development of nephropathy and urothelial carcinoma in humans. This study elucidated the mechanism of oxidative stress and DNA damage mediated by AAI in human cells. Treatment of human promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) and human renal proximal tubular cells (HK-2) with AAI led to a dose-dependent increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS). AAI also elevated the levels of DNA strand breaks and 8-hydroxy guanosine in HL-60 and HK-2 cells. Antioxidants, including Tiron, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) and glutathione (GSH), effectively suppressed the AAI-induced ROS and AAI-elicited genotoxicity, indicating that AAI induced the DNA damage through oxidative stress. GSH depletion was also found in AAI-treated cultures and proceeded prior to ROS formation. Exposure of HL-60 cells with AAI activated both ERK1/2 and p38 kinase phosphorylation, while only MEK1/2 inhibitor, U0126, significantly decreased AAI-mediated ROS. Preincubation of cells with thiol-containing compounds (NAC and GSH) inhibited the caspase 3 activity triggered by AAI, but non-thiol Tiron did not show a similar effect. This study demonstrated that AAI treatment results in oxidative stress-related DNA damage through GSH depletion and ERK1/2 activation; AAI-induced apoptosis is associated with GSH loss, but is independent of ROS generation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据