4.5 Article

Zinc at clinically-relevant concentrations potentiates the cytotoxicity of polysorbate 80, a non-ionic surfactant

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 737-744

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.01.004

关键词

Polysorbate 80; Zinc; Cytotoxicity; Lymphocyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polysorbate 80, a non-ionic surfactant, is used in the formula of water-insoluble anticancer agents for intravenous application. In our recent studies, this surfactant decreased cellular thiol content and the chemicals decreasing cellular thiol content increased intracellular Zn2+ concentration. In this study using rat thymocytes, the effect of polysorbate 80 on FluoZin-3 fluorescence, an indicator for intracellular Zn2+, and the influence of ZnCl2 on cytotoxicity of polysorbate 80 were examined in order to test the possibility that Zn2+ is involved in cytotoxic action of polysorbate 80. The surfactant at concentrations of 10 mu g/ml or more significantly augmented FluoZin-3 fluorescent in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating an increase in intracellular Zn2+ concentration. The increase by polysorbate 80 was also observed after removing extracellular Zn2+, suggesting an intracellular Zn2+ release. The simultaneous application of polysorbate 80 (301,mu g/ml) and ZnCl2 (10-30 mu M) significantly increased cell lethality. The simultaneous application of ZnCl2 accelerated the process of cell death induced by polysorbate 80 and the combination increased oxidative stress. Results may indicate that the cytotoxicity of polysorbate 80 at clinical concentrations is modified by micromolar zinc. Although there is no clinical report that polysorbate 80 and zinc salt are simultaneously applied to human as far as our knowledge, it may be speculated that zinc induces some diverse actions in cancer treatment with water-insoluble anticancer agent including nanoparticle drug of which the solvent is polysorbate 80. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据