4.5 Article

In vitro cytotoxic and immunomodulatory profiling of low molecular weight polyethylenimines for pulmonary application

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 500-508

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.01.001

关键词

Polyethylenimine; Pulmonary inflammation; Nanocarrier; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. German Research Council [DFG-Forschergruppe 627]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyethylenimines (PEI) are potent non-viral nucleic acid delivery vehicles used for gene delivery and RNA interference (RNAi). For non-invasive pulmonary RNAi therapy the respiratory tissue is an attractive application route, but offers particularly unwanted side-effects like cytotoxicity as well as inflammatory and immune responses. In the current study, we determined the most crucial issues of pulmonary applications for two low molecular weight PEIs in comparison to the well-known lung toxic crystalline silica. Cytotoxic effects and inflammatory responses were evaluated in three murine pulmonary target cell lines, the alveolar epithelial (LA4), the alveolar macrophage (MH-S) and the macrophage-monocyte-like (RAW 264.7) cell line. For both PEIs, cytotoxicity, was detected most prominently in the alveolar epithelial cells and only at high doses. Cytokine responses, in contrast were observed already at low PEI concentrations and could be divided into three groups, induced (i) by free PEI (IL-6, TNF-alpha, G-CSF), (ii) by PEI/siRNA complexes (CCL2, -5, CXCL1, -10), or (iii) unaffected by either treatment (IL-2, -4,-7, -9, and CCL3). We conclude that even for the respiratory tissue both PEIs represent powerful siRNA delivery tools with reduced cytotoxicity and minor proinflammatory potency. However, in relation to response levels observed upon crystalline silica exposures, some PEI induced proapoptotic and proinfammatory responses might not be considered completely harmless, therefore further in vivo investigations are advisable. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据