4.5 Article

Arginase release by primary hepatocytes and liver slices results in rapid conversion of arginine to urea in cell culture media

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 1094-1098

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.01.016

关键词

rats; hepatocytes; arginase; urea; precision-cut liver slices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precision-cut liver slices and primary hepatocytes constitute suitable model systems for studying liver function. Frequently, urea cycle activity is used as a parameter to determine hepatocyte viability. Liver cells contain high levels of the urea cycle enzyme arginase, which converts arginine into urea and ornithine. Arginase can leak from the cells into the supernatants, converting arginine directly to urea and in this way circumventing the urea cycle. In this study, a hepatocellular cell line (HepG2 cells), a primary rat hepatocyte culture, and precision-cut rat liver slices were compared with respect to arginase leakage in the media by determining arginine conversion into urea. HepG2 cells did not show arginine conversion to urea during 24 It incubations. In contrast, in both precision-cut liver slices and primary rat hepatocytes all arginine was converted to urea. Arginase activity was confirmed by showing that freshly added arginine to the cell-free supernatants again was converted to urea. In conclusion, when choosing urea production of primary hepatocytes cultures as a viability indicator, one has to take into account that arginase can leak from the cells into the supernatant. This can lead to an overestimation of the viability of the cells, since arginase converts arginine into urea without involvement of the urea cycle. We suggest using an extra incubation in an arginine-free buffer supplemented with ornithine and NH4Cl. In addition, arginase leakage can lead to depletion of the supernatant of arginine in primary hepatocytes cell cultures. This might have implications for studying cellular activities where arginine is involved, like, e.g. nitric oxide (NO) production. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据