4.6 Article

Exposure to ZnO nanoparticles induces oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in human colon carcinoma cells

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 246, 期 3, 页码 116-127

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.04.012

关键词

Nanoparticles; Electron microscopy; Colon carcinoma cells; Oxidative stress; Cell death; Inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineered nanoparticles offer great promise in many industrial and biomedical applications, however little information is available about gastrointestinal toxicity The purpose of this study was to assess the cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis and proinflammatory mediator release induced by ZnO nanoparticles on human colon carcinoma LoVo cells The biological activity of these particles was related to their physico-chemical characteristics The physico-chemical characteristics were evaluated by analytical electron microscopy The cytotoxicity was determined by growth curves and water-soluble tetrazolium assay The reactive oxygen species production, cellular glutathione content, changes of mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis cell death were quantified by flow cytometry. The inflammatory cytokines were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay Treatment with ZnO (5 mu g/cm(2) corresponding to 11 5 mu g/ml) for 24 h induced on LoVo cells a significant decrease of cell viability, H2O2/OH center dot increase, 02(-center dot) and GSH decrease, depolarization of inner mitochondrial membranes, apoptosis and IL-8 release Higher doses induced about 98% of cytotoxicity already after 24 h of treatment The experimental data show that oxidative stress may be a key route in inducing the cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in colon carcinoma cells Moreover, the study of the relationship between toxicological effects and physico-chemical characteristics of particles suggests that surface area does not play a primary role in the cytotoxicity (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据