4.7 Article

Involvement of miRNAs in the early phase of halothane-induced liver injury

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 319, 期 -, 页码 75-84

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.011

关键词

miRNA; Drug-induced liver injury; Halothane; miR-106b; STAT3

资金

  1. Health and Labor Sciences Research
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan [H23-BIO-G001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNA) form a class of small non-coding RNA molecules that negatively regulate gene expression. Most cellular pathways are modulated by miRNAs. However, the pathophysiological role of miRNAs during drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains largely unknown. In this study, the possible involvement of miRNAs in DILI caused by the hepatotoxic drug halothane (HAL) was investigated. Toward this purpose, miRNA microarray studies of HAL-induced liver injury were performed in mice at five different time points up to 24 h after dosing. To exclude any pharmacological effects on miRNA expression, isoflurane was used as a low hepatotoxic drug because it is structurally similar to HAL. Approximately 30-50% of the miRNA expression levels changed more than two-fold at every time point. In silica biological pathway analysis was performed to predict the targeted genes. Consequently, the miRNA gene down-regulation that occurred 1 h after HAL administration was primarily related to inflammation, immune systems and liver injury. Based on additional in silico analyses, we identified miR-106b. Subsequently target of miR-106b was investigated using liver samples from mice with HAL-induced liver injury. Among the predicted targets, we discovered that a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was particularly up-regulated beginning during the early phase of HAL-induced liver injury. Collectively, the suppressed miR-106b expression, as well as the subsequent up-regulation of STAT3, was critical for the pathogenesis of HAL-induced liver injury. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据