4.7 Article

Genotoxic and endocrine activities of bis(hydroxyphenyl)methane (bisphenol F) and its derivatives in the HepG2 cell line

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 255, 期 1-2, 页码 15-24

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.024

关键词

Bisphenol F Diglycidyl Ether (BFDGE); Bisphenol F (BPF); Oxidative BPF metabolites; Genotoxicity; Endocrine activities; Human cell lines

资金

  1. Regional Council of Burgundy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human can be exposed to bis(hydroxyphenyl)methane (bisphenol F or BPF) and its derivatives as environment and food's contaminants. This study was investigated to identify and to compare toxic potency of BPF, BFDGE, and two of BPF metabolites using in vitro methods. BPF did not induce any genic mutation in bacteria when the Ames test was performed according to the OECD guideline. In contrast, using Human cell lines and Comet assay, we demonstrated that BPF and Bisphenol F Diglycidyl Ether (BFDGE) were effective on HepG2 cell DNA fragmentation at non-cytotoxic concentrations. DHB was also positive but at higher concentrations, near its limit of solubility. Neither BPF, nor DHB induced a positive response in the micronucleus assay. The increase of micronuclei observed when cells were exposed to BFDGE was mostly due to a cytotoxic effect. Concerning endocrine activities, BPF increased the luciferase activity in HepG2 cells transiently transfected with a concentration dependant pattern, DHB also induced a positive response but at highest concentrations. Estrogenic responses in the HepG2 cells differed with the estrogen receptor (ER) involved. Using MDA-kb(2) cell line stably transfected with pMMTV-neo-Luc, only BPF was anti-androgenic at the highest concentration (10(-5) M). Then, we demonstrated using human cell lines, especially HepG2, BPF was the most toxic compound in term of genotoxicity and endocrine activities compared to DHB and BPF-OH, the free metabolites identified in rat urine when BPF was administrated to rats. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据