4.5 Article

Crizotinib Reduces the Rate of Dark Adaptation in the Rat Retina Independent of ALK Inhibition

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 116-125

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu213

关键词

electroretinogram; retina; XalkoriA (R); PF-02341066; PF-06463922; anaplastic lymphoma kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crizotinib (XalkoriA (R)) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of both anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met). Though not predicted from standard nonclinical toxicological evaluation, visual disturbance became a frequently observed adverse event in humans. To understand the possible mechanism of this vision effect, an in vivo electroretinogram (ERG) study was conducted to assess retinal functional changes following oral administration of crizotinib. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of ALK and c-Met in the neural retinas of human, non-human primate, dog, rat, and mouse was used to aid in the animal model selection. ALK IHC staining was identified predominantly in the ganglion cell and inner nuclear layers of most species evaluated, in the inner plexiform layer in human and rodent, and in the nerve fiber layer in human and rat only. There was no apparent staining of any layer of the neural retina for c-Met in any of the species evaluated. ERG measurements identified a significant reduction in b-wave amplitude during the initial phase of dark adaptation in the crizotinib-treated rats. ERGs were also taken following oral administration of PF-06463922 (an ALK-selective inhibitor), for an understanding of potential kinase involvement. ERG effects were not observed in PF-06463922-treated animals when comparable exposures in the vitreous humor were achieved. Collectively, our results suggest that the ERG b-wave amplitude decreases during dark adaption following crizotinib administration may be related to signaling changes within the retina in rats, likely independent of ALK inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据