4.5 Article

Concentration-Response Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test Following Flusilazole Exposure

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 303-312

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs092

关键词

zebrafish embryotoxicity test; toxicogenomics; concentration-response; alternative test; flusilazole; triazole

资金

  1. Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [050-060-510]
  2. Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) is considered a promising alternative model in predictive toxicology. Currently, morphological assessment of the embryo is the main readout for this assay. However, implementation of transcriptomics may help to detect more subtle effects, which may increase the sensitivity and predictability of the test. In this study, we tested a concentration response of flusilazole in the ZET. After exposure for 24 h postfertilization, microarray analysis revealed a number of processes to be regulated in a concentration-dependent way. We identified development related processes, retinol metabolism and transcription, as well as processes corresponding to the antifungal mechanism of action, steroid biosynthesis, and fatty acid metabolism, to be differentially regulated. Retinol metabolism and transcription were already significantly altered at concentrations that were not inducing morphological effects. Differential expression of genes related to steroid biosynthesis and fatty acid metabolism showed a concentration response similar to morphological response. An increase in concentration was also positively associated with an increase in magnitude of expression for individual genes within functional processes. Our study shows that transcriptomics analysis in the ZET is a more sensitive readout of compound-induced effects than morphological assessment. However, the interpretation of differential gene expression in terms of predicting morphological effects is not straightforward and requires further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据