4.5 Article

DNA Double-Strand Breaks and DNA Recombination in Benzene Metabolite-Induced Genotoxicity

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 569-577

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs001

关键词

benzene; benzoquinone; fetal; blood cells; reactive oxygen species; DNA damage

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP 394-896]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In utero exposure to environmental carcinogens, including the ubiquitous pollutant benzene, may cause DNA damage in the fetus, leading to an increased risk for the development of childhood cancer. Benzene metabolite-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) may undergo erroneous repair, leading to chromosomal aberrations including chromosomal inversions and translocations. In this study, fetal murine hematopoietic cells from pZK1 transgenic mice were exposed to p-benzoquinone (BQ), a toxic metabolite of benzene, and assessed for DNA recombination, DNA damage including DNA DSBs as measured by gamma-H2A.X foci and oxidative DNA damage, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The pZK1 transgenic mouse model contains a DNA construct allowing for the detection of intrachromosomal recombination events. Using this model, a significant increase in recombination was observed following exposure to BQ (25 and 50 mu M) at various time points. Additionally, increased gamma-H2A.X foci were observed following exposure to 25 mu M BQ for 30 min, 45 min, and 1 h, whereas this exposure did not significantly increase oxidative DNA damage. Pretreatment with 400 U/ml polyethylene glycol-conjugated-catalase attenuated increases in DNA recombination as compared with treatment with BQ alone. An increase in ROS production (30 min and 1 h), as measured by dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate fluorescence, was also observed following exposure to 25 mu M BQ. These studies indicate that BQ is able to induce DNA damage and recombination in fetal liver cells and that ROS may be important in the mechanism of toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据