4.5 Article

Mutagenicity of Acrylamide and Glycidamide in the Testes of Big Blue Mice

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 117, 期 1, 页码 72-80

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq190

关键词

acrylamide; glycidamide; Big Blue mice; testes; mutation frequency; mutation spectrum

资金

  1. National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR)/U.S. Food and Drug Administration [224-07-0007]
  2. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences
  3. NCTR
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acrylamide (AA) is an industrial chemical, a by-product of fried starchy foods, and a mutagen and rodent carcinogen. It can also cause damage during spermatogenesis. In this study, we investigated whether AA and its metabolite glycidamide (GA) induce mutagenic effects in the germ cells of male mice. Male Big Blue transgenic mice were administered 1.4 or 7.0mM of AA or GA in the drinking water for up to 4 weeks. Testicular cII mutant frequency (MF) was determined 3 weeks after the last treatment, and the types of the mutations in the cII gene were analyzed by DNA sequencing. The testes cII MFs in mice treated with either the low or high exposure concentrations of AA and GA were increased significantly. There was no significant difference in the cII MFs between AA and GA at the low exposure concentration. The mutation spectra in mice treated with AA (1.4mM) or GA (both 1.4 and 7.0mM) differed significantly from those of controls, but there were no significant differences in mutation patterns between AA and GA treatments. Comparison of the mutation spectra between testes and livers showed that the spectra differed significantly between the two tissues following treatment with AA or GA, whereas the mutation spectra in the two tissues from control mice were similar. These results suggest that AA possesses mutagenic effects on testes by virtue of its metabolism to GA, possibly targeting spermatogonial stem cells, but possibly via different pathways when compared mutations in liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据