4.5 Article

A Minimally Invasive, Translational Biomarker of Ketamine-Induced Neuronal Death in Rats: microPET Imaging Using 18F-Annexin V

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 355-361

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp167

关键词

ketamine; apoptosis; microPET

资金

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration [E7264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been reported that suppression of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function by ketamine may trigger apoptosis of neurons when given repeatedly during the brain growth spurt period. Because microPET scans can provide in vivo molecular imaging at sufficient resolution, it has been proposed as a minimally invasive method for detecting apoptosis using the tracer F-18-labeled annexin V. In this study, the effect of ketamine on the metabolism and integrity of the rat brain were evaluated by investigating the uptake and retention of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and F-18-annexin V using microPET imaging. On postnatal day (PND) 7, rat pups in the experimental group were exposed to six injections of ketamine (20 mg/kg at 2-h intervals) and control rat pups received six injections of saline. On PND 35, 37 MBq (1 mCi) of F-18-FDG or F-18-annexin V was injected into the tail vein of treated and control rats, and static microPET images were obtained over I (FDG) and 2 In (annexin V) following the injection. No significant difference was found in F-18-FDG uptake in the regions of interest (ROIs) in the brains of ketamine-treated rats compared with saline-treated controls. The uptake of F-18-annexin V, however, was significantly increased in the ROI of ketamine-treated rats. Additionally, the duration of annexin V tracer washout was prolonged in the ketamine-treated animals. These results demonstrate that microPET imaging is capable of distinguishing differences in retention (if F-18-annexin V in different brain regions and suggests that this approach may provide a minimally invasive biomarker of neuronal apoptosis in rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据