4.0 Article

Identification of Environmental Chemicals Associated with the Development of Toxicant-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Rodents

期刊

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 482-497

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0192623314549960

关键词

TASH; NAFLD; ToxRefDB; CEBS; pesticides; steatosis; steatohepatitis

资金

  1. NIHS [R01ES021375, 5T35ES011564, K23AA018399]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Toxicant-associated fatty liver disease (TAFLD) is a recently identified form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with exposure to industrial chemicals and environmental pollutants. Numerous studies have been conducted to test the association between industrial chemicals/environmental pollutants and fatty liver disease both in vivo and in vitro. Objectives: The objective of the article is to report a list of chemicals associated with TAFLD. Methods: Two federal databases of rodent toxicology studiesToxicological Reference Database (ToxRefDB; Environmental Protection Agency) and Chemical Effects in Biological Systems (CEBS, National Toxicology Program)were searched for liver end points. Combined, these 2 databases archive nearly 2,000 rodent studies. Toxicant-associated steatohepatitis (TASH) descriptors including fatty change, fatty necrosis, Oil red O-positive staining, steatosis, and lipid deposition were queried. Results: Using these search terms, 123 chemicals associated with fatty liver were identified. Pesticides and solvents were the most frequently identified chemicals, while polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)/dioxins were the most potent. About 44% of identified compounds were pesticides or their intermediates, and >10% of pesticide registration studies in ToxRefDB were associated with fatty liver. Fungicides and herbicides were more frequently associated with fatty liver than insecticides. Conclusion: More research on pesticides, solvents, metals, and PCBs/dioxins in NAFLD/TAFLD is warranted due to their association with liver damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据