4.0 Article

Physiology and Endocrinology of the Ovarian Cycle in Macaques

期刊

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 7S-23S

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0192623308327412

关键词

cynomolgus monkey; rhesus monkey; marmoset; reproduction; female

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [R01 AT000639, R01 AT000639-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R01AT000639] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macaques provide excellent models for preclinical testing and safety assessment of female reproductive toxicants. Currently, cynomolgus monkeys are the predominant species for (reproductive) toxicity testing. Marmosets and rhesus monkeys are being used occasionally. The authors provide a brief review on physiology and endocrinology of the cynomolgus monkey ovarian cycle, practical guidance on assessment and monitoring of ovarian cyclicity, and new data on effects of social housing on ovarian cyclicity in toxicological studies. In macaques, cycle monitoring is achieved using daily vaginal smears for menstruation combined with cycle-timed frequent sampling for steroid and peptide hormone analysis. Owing to requirements of frequent and timed blood sampling, it is not recommended to incorporate these special evaluations into a general toxicity study design. Marmosets lack external signs of ovarian cyclicity, and cycle monitoring is done by regular determinations of progesterone. Cynomolgus and marmoset monkeys do not exhibit seasonal variations in ovarian activity, whereas such annual rhythm is pronounced in rhesus monkeys. Studies on pair- and group-housed cynomolgus monkeys revealed transient alterations in the duration and endocrinology of the ovarian cycle followed by return to normal cyclicity after approximately six months. This effect is avoided if the animals had contact with each other prior to mingling. These experiments also demonstrated that synchronization of ovarian cycles did not occur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据