4.6 Article

Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording

期刊

PLOS BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research council DECRA fellowship [DE140101481]
  2. ARC Discovery Grant
  3. ARC Future Fellowship
  4. Australian Research Council [DE140101481] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observer bias and other experimenter effects occur when researchers' expectations influence study outcome. These biases are strongest when researchers expect a particular result, are measuring subjective variables, and have an incentive to produce data that confirm predictions. To minimize bias, it is good practice to work blind, meaning that experimenters are unaware of the identity or treatment group of their subjects while conducting research. Here, using text mining and a literature review, we find evidence that blind protocols are uncommon in the life sciences and that nonblind studies tend to report higher effect sizes and more significant p-values. We discuss methods to minimize bias and urge researchers, editors, and peer reviewers to keep blind protocols in mind.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据