4.1 Article

Benefits of Spine Stabilization with Biodegradable Scaffolds in Spinal Cord Injured Rats

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 101-108

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0264

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/40684/2007, PTDC/SAU-BMA/114059/2009]
  2. Foundation Calouste de Gulbenkian
  3. European FP7 Project Find and Bind [NMP4-SL-2009-229292]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BMA/114059/2009, SFRH/BD/40684/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spine stabilization upon spinal cord injury (SCI) is a standard procedure in clinical practice, but rarely employed in experimental models. Moreover, the application of biodegradable biomaterials for this would come as an advantage as it would eliminate the presence of a nondegradable prosthesis within the vertebral bone. Therefore, in the present work, we propose the use of a new biodegradable device specifically developed for spine stabilization in a rat model of SCI. A 3D scaffold based on a blend of starch with polycaprolactone was implanted, replacing delaminated vertebra, in male Wistar rats with a T8-T9 spinal hemisection. The impact of spinal stabilization on the locomotor behavior was then evaluated for a period of 12 weeks. Locomotor evaluation-assessed by Basso, Beatie, and Bresnahan test; rotarod; and open field analysis-revealed that injured rats subjected to spine stabilization significantly improved their motor performance, including higher coordination and rearing activity when compared with SCI rats without stabilization. Histological analysis further revealed that the presence of the scaffolds not only stabilized the area, but also simultaneously prevented the infiltration of the injury site by connective tissue. Overall, these results reveal that SCI stabilization using a biodegradable scaffold at the vertebral bone level leads to an improvement of the motor deficits and is a relevant element for the successful treatment of SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据