4.1 Article

Xenofree Enzymatic Products for the Isolation of Human Adipose-Derived Stromal/Stem Cells

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 473-478

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0465

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/44128/2008]
  2. [MIT/ECE/0047/2009]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/44128/2008, MIT/ECE/0047/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) are an abundant, readily available population of adult stem cells that reside in adipose tissue and that have a great potential utility for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine therapeutic applications. Several preclinical studies have shown that ASCs have therapeutic applicability, but a standardized isolation and expansion methodology for clinical cell therapy has yet to be established. ASC are typically isolated and expanded using reagents with xenogenic components and this may pose certain risks and safety issues, such as exposure to infectious agents and immune reactions, creating further obstacles to the translation of ASC-based therapies to clinical scenarios. The objective of this study was to determine the suitability and efficacy of various alternative enzymatic products, CLS1 (Worthington), CLSAFA (Worthington), NB4 (SERVA), and Liberase (Roche), for the digestion of adipose tissue and subsequent isolation of ASCs, assessing cell functionality concerning their proliferation and differentiation ability. Results show that there are no statistically significant differences on yield and proliferation of cells isolated after enzymatic digestion with any of the studied products. The differentiation potential of the cells was not affected, and cell surface marker expression was similar among all products. We concluded that clinical grade products can replace current research-grade products effectively in our cell isolation protocols without any negative effect in the yield or function of human ASCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据