4.4 Article

Translating Cell-Based Regenerative Medicines from Research to Successful Products: Challenges and Solutions

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 246-256

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0727

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K00705X/1, EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10008] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K00705X/1, EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine International Society-Europe (TERMIS-EU) Industry Committee as well as its TERMIS-Americas (AM) counterpart intend to address the specific challenges and needs facing the industry in translating academic research into commercial products. Over the last 3 years, the TERMIS-EU Industry Committee has worked with commercial bodies to deliver programs that encourage academics to liaise with industry in proactive collaborations. The TERMIS-EU 2013 Industry Symposium aimed to build on this commercial agenda by focusing on two topics: Operations Management (How to move a process into the good manufacturing practice [GMP] environment) and Clinical Translation (Moving a GMP process into robust trials). These topics were introduced by providing the synergistic business perspective of partnering between the multiple regenerative medicine stakeholders, throughout the life cycle of product development. Seven industry leaders were invited to share their experience, expertise, and strategies. Due to the complex nature of regenerative medicine products, partnering for their successful commercial development seems inevitable to overcome all obstacles by sharing experiences and expertise of all stakeholders. When ideally implemented, the innovation quotient of a virtual team resulting from the combination of internal and external project teams can be maximized through maximizing the three main dimensions: core competences, technology portfolio, and alliance management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据