4.2 Article

The Survey on Cellular and Engineered Tissue Therapies in Europe in 2010

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 18, 期 21-22, 页码 2268-2279

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0169

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Leukaemia Net [LSH-2002-2.2.0-3]
  2. Amgen Europe
  3. Gilead Sciences UK
  4. Miltenyl Biotec GmbH
  5. Schering-Plough
  6. Celegene International SARL
  7. Genzyme
  8. Fresenius Biotech GmbH
  9. CaridianBCT Europe NV
  10. Therakos
  11. Cephalon
  12. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  13. Gentium SpA
  14. Pierre Fabre Medicament
  15. Alexion Europe
  16. Pfizer
  17. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  18. Chugai Sanofi-Aventis
  19. Novartis
  20. Hospira
  21. MacroPharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following the coordinated efforts of five established scientific organizations, this report describes the novel cellular therapy activity in Europe for the year 2010. One hundred six teams from 27 countries responded to the cellular therapy survey, 69 teams from 21 countries provided data on 1010 patients using a dedicated survey; 37 teams reported no activity. These data were combined with an additional 260 records reported by 37 teams in 15 countries to the standard European group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database. Indications were graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD; 26%; 11% autologous), musculoskeletal disorders (25%; 93% autologous), cardiovascular disorders (20%; 100% autologous), epithelial disorders (16%; 44% autologous), autoimmune diseases (11%; 55% autologous), and neurological disorders (2%; 62% autologous). Autologous cells were predominantly used for musculoskeletal (39%) and cardiovascular (32%) disorders, whereas allogeneic cells were mainly used for GvHD (58%) and epithelial disorders (23%). The reported cell types were mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC; 49%), hematopoietic stem cells (28%), chondrocytes (10%), dermal fibroblasts (4%), keratinocytes (1%), and others (8%). In 63% of the grafts, cells were delivered following ex vivo expansion, whereas cells were transduced or sorted respectively in 10% or 28% of the reported cases. Cells were delivered intraorgan (45%), intravenously (31%), on a membrane or gel (20%) or using 3D scaffolds (4%). Compared with last year, the number of teams adopting the dedicated survey was 1.25-fold higher and, with few exceptions, the collected data confirmed the captured trends. This year's edition specifically discusses scientific, clinical, regulatory, and commercial aspects related to the use of cell therapy for the repair of cartilage defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据