4.2 Article

Hypoxia Impedes Vasculogenesis of In Vitro Engineered Bone

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 18, 期 1-2, 页码 208-218

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0731

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [016.096.359]
  4. NICHD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To ensure the survival of engineered bone after implantation, we combined human endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) and multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) as a proof of concept in a co-culture model to create in vitro prevascularized bone constructs. We hypothesized that a hypoxic stimulus will contribute to prevascularization of engineered bone. Bone marrow-derived MSCs and ECFCs from human adult peripheral blood were allowed to form co-culture pellets containing ECFCs and MSCs (1: 4) or MSCs only in controls. After culture under normoxia or hypoxia (5%), pellets were harvested and processed for immunohistochemistry of CD31, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and osteocalcin. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and SDF-1 alpha was analyzed by PCR to elucidate their involvement in hypoxic stimulation of prevascularization. The normoxic condition in co-cultures of MSCs and ECFCs supported the formation and maintenance of prevascular structures, including organized CD31-positive cells embraced by differentiated mural cells. These structures failed to form in hypoxic conditions, thereby rejecting the hypothesis that hypoxia stimulates prevasculogenesis in three-dimensional engineered bone constructs. Further, the formation of prevascular structures was paralleled by increased SDF-1 alpha expression. It is suggested that actual oxygen levels were below 5% in the hypoxic co-cultures, which prevented prevascular structure formation. In conclusion, our normoxic co-culture model containing cells from clinically relevant sources sustained simultaneous endothelial, smooth muscle, and osteogenic differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据