4.2 Article

Guiding Epithelial Cell Phenotypes with Engineered Integrin-Specific Recombinant Fibronectin Fragments

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 17, 期 1-2, 页码 139-150

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0199

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF ERC Georgia Tech/Emory Tissue Engineering Center (GTEC) [EEC-9731643]
  2. NSF ERC [EEC-9731643]
  3. [T32-GM008433]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008433] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides important cues for directing cell phenotype. Cells interact with underlying ECM through cell-surface receptors known as integrins, which bind to specific sequences on their ligands. During tissue development, repair, and regeneration of epithelial tissues, cells must interact with an interstitial fibronectin (Fn)-rich matrix, which has been shown to direct a more migratory/repair phenotype, presumably through interaction with Fn's cell binding domain comprised of both synergy Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn (PHSRN) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequences. We hypothesized that the Fn synergy site is critical to the regulation of epithelial cell phenotype by directing integrin specificity. Epithelial cells were cultured on Fn fragments displaying stabilized synergy and RGD (FnIII9'10), or RGD alone (FnIII10) and cell phenotype analyzed by cytoskeleton changes, epithelial cell-cell contacts, changes in gene expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers, and wound healing assay. Data indicate that epithelial cells engage RGD only with alpha v integrins and display a significant shift toward a mesenchymal phenotype due, in part, to enhanced transforming growth factor-beta activation and/or signaling compared with cells on the synergy containing FnIII9'10. These studies demonstrate the importance of synergy in regulating epithelial cell phenotype relevant to tissue engineering as well as the utility of engineered integrin-specific ECM fragments in guiding cell phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据