4.2 Article

Uncultured Marrow Mononuclear Cells Delivered Within Fibrin Glue Hydrogels to Porous Scaffolds Enhance Bone Regeneration Within Critical-Sized Rat Cranial Defects

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 3555-3568

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0471

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DE017441]
  2. Baylor College of Medicine [NIH T32 GM07330]
  3. Rice Institute of Biosciences and Bioengineering [NIH T32 GM008362]
  4. Gulf Coast Consortia (NIH) [5 T90 DK070121-04]
  5. Robert and Janice McNair Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For bone tissue engineering, the benefits of incorporating mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into porous scaffolds are well established. There is, however, little consensus on the effects of or need for MSC handling ex vivo. Culture and expansion of MSCs adds length and cost, and likely increases risk associated with treatment. We evaluated the effect of using uncultured bone marrow mononuclear cells (bmMNCs) encapsulated within fibrin glue hydrogels and seeded into porous scaffolds to regenerate bone over 12 weeks in an 8-mm-diameter, critical-sized rat cranial defect. A full factorial experimental design was used to evaluate bone formation within model poly(L-lactic acid) and corraline hydroxyapatite scaffolds with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bmMNCs. Mechanical push-out testing, microcomputed tomographical analyses, and histology were performed. PRP showed no benefit for bone formation. Cell-laden poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds without PRP required significantly greater force to displace from surrounding tissues than control (cell-free) scaffolds, but no differences were observed during push-out testing of coral scaffolds. For bone volume formation as analyzed by microcomputed tomography, significant positive overall effects were observed with bmMNC incorporation. These data suggest that bmMNCs may provide therapeutic advantages in bone tissue engineering applications without the need for culture, expansion, and purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据