4.2 Article

Extramedullary chitosan channels promote survival of transplanted neural stem and progenitor cells and create a tissue bridge after complete spinal cord transection

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 649-665

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/tea.2007.0180

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplantation of neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) is a promising strategy for repair after spinal cord injury. However, the epicenter of the severely damaged spinal cord is a hostile environment that results in poor survival of the transplanted NSPCs. We examined implantation of extramedullary chitosan channels seeded with NSPCs derived from transgenic green fluorescent protein (GFP) rats after spinal cord transection (SCT). At 14 weeks, we assessed the survival, maturation, and functional results using NSPCs harvested from the brain (brain group) or spinal cord (SC group) and seeded into chitosan channels implanted between the cord stumps after complete SCT. Control SCT animals had empty chitosan channels or no channels implanted. Channels seeded with brain or spinal cord-derived NSPCs showed a tissue bridge, although the bridges were thicker in the brain group. Both cell types showed long-term survival, but the number of surviving cells in the brain group was approximately five times as great as in the SC group. In both the brain and SC groups at 14 weeks after transplantation, many host axons were present in the center of the bridge in association with the transplanted cells. At 14 weeks astrocytic and oligodendrocytic differentiation in the channels was 24.8% and 17.3%, respectively, in the brain group, and 31.8% and 9.7%, respectively, in the SC group. The channels caused minimal tissue reaction in the adjacent spinal cord. There was no improvement in locomotor function. Thus, implantation of chitosan channels seeded with NSPCs after SCT created a tissue bridge containing many surviving transplanted cells and host axons, although there was no functional improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据