4.6 Article

Plasma Microparticle Tissue Factor Activity in Patients With Antiphospholipid Antibodies With and Without Clinical Complications

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 133, 期 2, 页码 187-189

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.11.027

关键词

Microparticle; Tissue factor; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Thrombosis; Pregnancy

资金

  1. NIH [T32 HL007149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the association of autoantibodies to certain phospholipidbinding proteins with arterial or venous thrombosis ('AT' or 'VT', respectively), and/or pregnancy-related morbidity (PM). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) promote activation of several cell types including monocytes, resulting in procoagulant tissue factor (TF) expression that may contribute to the vascular complications. Since TF synthesis by monocytes is frequently accompanied by release of TF-bearing microparticles, we hypothesized that plasma microparticle TF activity (MP-TF) may be elevated in APS patients and contribute to thrombosis and/or PM. Platelet-poor plasma specimens were obtained from 30 patients with definite APS and 72 patients with asymptomatic aPLA from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Collaborative Registry (APSCORE). MP-TF was measured by an in-house factor Xa generation assay. The two groups were well matched for gender, age, ethnicity, proportions with underlying SLE, and aPLA profiles. MP-TF (median and (IQR)) in asymptomatic aPLA subjects was 0.09 pg/mL (0.05-0.14) compared to 0.13 pg/mL (0.10-0.17) in APS (p < 0.001). No differences in MP-TF levels were observed between APS subjects with PM, thrombosis, or PM + thrombosis. Similarly, among subjects with either APS or asymptomatic aPLA, MP-TF did not differ in the presence or absence of underlying SLE. Prospective studies will be required to determine if plasma MP-TF activity is causally related to thrombotic or gestational complications in APS. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据