4.6 Article

Human platelets do not express tissue factor

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 112-115

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.010

关键词

Tissue factor; Platelets; LPS; Complement; TLR4; Monocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The controversy about the expression of tissue factor (TF) in platelet after de novo synthesis prevail despite many groups recognize that platelet isolation, assays and reagents, particularly non-specific antibodies, may account for the diversity. In this study the potential of TF expression was evaluated using immune-purified human platelets and employing a very sensitive and highly specific TF activity assay. Methods: Isolated platelets in plasma anti-coagulated with Fragmin were subjected to stimulation by LPS plus PMA, IgG antibody or TRAP and tested for TF activity. Results: Platelets stimulated with LPS plus PMA for 4 hours expressed trace amounts of TF like activity (PCA), not inhibited by anti-TF antibody (0.2 +/- 0.1 mU/ml blood). Platelets, not immune-adsorbed to remove monocytes, showed significant TF activity (2.0 +/- 0.9 mU/ml blood) that was nearly abolished by anti-TF antibody. IgG antibody from patient with lupus anticoagulant failed to enhance the trace amount of PCA as compared to the control in contrast to high TF activity induced in monocytes (0.4 +/- 0.1 mU/ml blood versus 27.5 +/- 10.5 mU/10(6) cells) showing that activation of complement is not mediating TF expression. Platelet subjected to TRAP activation for 10 min possessed only trace amounts of PCA that was not inhibited by anti-TF antibody and slightly enhanced by anti-TFPI antibody. Conclusions: It is concluded that platelets free of monocytes do not express TF activity when stimulated by LPS or activated complement factors, implying no role for Toll like receptor (TLR4) as suggested recently. There is no evidence of TF activity associated with platelets as a result of rapid and dynamic process. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据