4.6 Article

Incidence of venous thromboembolism before treatment in cervical cancer and the impact of management on venous thromboembolism after commencement of treatment

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 E127-E132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.01.027

关键词

cervical cancer; venous thromboembolism; D-dimer; risk factor

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan [20591937]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591937, 24659556, 24390286, 23659770] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Silent venous thromboembolism (VTE) often occurs before treatment in ovarian or endometrial cancer and management can decrease VTE after treatment. However, the incidence of VTE before treatment and the impact of management are still unclear in cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: We investigated the incidence of VTE before treatment in 272 consecutive patients with cervical cancer, and the impact of management on prevention of VTE during and after treatment. D-dimer levels before treatment were examined in all patients. Venous ultrasonography of the lower extremities was performed in patients with D-dimer >= 1.5 mu g/ml. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the pelvis or abdomen was diagnosed by enhanced computed tomography. Results: Thirteen patients (4.8%; 3 preoperatively, 10 before radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy) were diagnosed with DVT, although DVT was symptomatic in only 1 patient. None of the 13 patients showed pulmonary embolism on pulmonary scanning. Although 4 of 128 patients (3.1%) developed VTE after radical hysterectomy, none of the 124 patients who underwent radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy developed VTE during or after treatment. Conclusions: These data suggest that VTE before treatment occurs less frequently with cervical cancer than with ovarian or endometrial cancer. However, management may decrease VTE during and after treatment, especially radiotherapy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据