4.6 Review

Tissue factor expression in blood cells

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 S31-S34

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.01.032

关键词

Tissue factor; monocytes; granulocytes; platelets; endothelial cells; microparticles

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The popular concept of TF serving predominantly as a hemostatic envelope encapsulating the vascular bed, has recently been challenged by the observation that blood of healthy individuals may form TF-induced thrombus under conditions entailing shear stress and activated platelets, corroborating the notion of blood borne TF. Accordingly, small amounts of TF activity is detected in calcium ionophore-stimulated monocytes, whereas it is questionable whether neutrophils and eosinophils express TF. Still there are contradicting reports on TF synthesis and expression in activated platelets, but when using a very sensitive and specific assay for TF activity measurements, we fail to detect TF activity associated with platelets activated with various agonists. However, activated platelets may play a role in decrypting monocyte TF activity in a process entailing transfer of TF to activated platelets in a P-seelctin -PSGL-1 reaction whereby inactive TF (encrypted) becomes active through the availability of clusters of phosphatidylserine. Microparticles from plasma of healthy subjects possess weak TF-like activity which is not inactivated by anti-TF antibody. Endothelial cells are well documented to synthesize TF by several agonists in vitro. In contrast, there is little evidence that these cells are capable of synthesizing TF in vivo, and a recent report fails to show that TF on the endothelium may play any role in thrombin generation in a murine endotoxemia model. It may be concluded that monocytes are the only blood cells that synthesize and express TF and which may be the only source for TF-induced thrombosis when the endothelium is intact. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据