4.6 Article

Incidence, risk factors and consequences of portal vein and systemic thromboses in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 299-306

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.10.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K23 CA120587, 1K23 CA120587-01A1, K23 CA120587-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA120587] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Hemostatic activation may be important for tumor biology. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Little is known about factors predictive for PVT in patients with HCC or its correlation with systemic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 194 consecutive patients diagnosed with HCC at the University of Rochester between 1998 and 2004 to identify the frequency and risk factors for PVT and its correlation with VTE and survival. Results: Sixty patients (31%) had PVT with a higher rate in the non-transplant group compared to transplanted patients (34% vs. 24%; p=0.15). In multivariate analysis, Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP) class, stage, major vessel involvement, serum albumin, and serum AFP were independently associated with PVT (p<0.05 for each). The presence of PVT was associated with reduced survival (median survival 2.3 months for those with PVT versus 17.6 months for those without PVT, HR 2.05, p=0.004). The incidence of systemic VTE in the total population was 6.7%, and patients with PVT had a higher rate of systemic VTE compared to patients without PVT (11.5% vs. 4.4%; p=0.04). Conclusion: PVT is common in patients with HCC, indicates advanced disease, is associated with worse survival and correlates with systemic VTE, suggesting a common mechanism of hemostatic activation. Advanced stage, higher CTP class, major vessel involvement, low serum albumin, and high AFP levels are predictive of PVT in patients with HCC. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据