4.6 Article

The relationship between maintenance dosages of three vitamin K antagonists: Acenocoumarol, warfarin and phenprocoumon

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 225-230

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.01.020

关键词

Anticoagulants; Clinical studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Vitamin K antagonists of the coumarin type are widely used oral anticoagulants. Objective: We developed a transition algorithm for the maintenance dosages of three frequently used coumarins: warfarin, phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol. Methods: The study was conducted at the Leiden Anticoagulation Clinic. Patients were participants in a trial of which the main objective was to compare the quality of an oral anticoagutant therapy with phenprocoumon to warfarin. We included patients who initiated oral anticoagulant therapy and patients who were already using acenocoumarol. Patients were randomized to a treatment with warfarin or phenprocoumon. Patients who were randomized to warfarin switched to phenprocoumon at the end of follow-up. We analysed the switch from acenocoumarol to warfarin or phenprocoumon at the start of follow-up and the switch of warfarin to phenprocoumon at the end of follow-up and calculated the transition factors for stable anticoagulation between these three vitamin K antagonists. Results: Fifty-eight patients switched from warfarin to phenprocoumon, 39 from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon and 44 from acenocoumarol to warfarin. The maintenance dose of warfarin was 0.41 (95%CI 0.39-0.43) times the maintenance dose of phenprocoumon. The transition factor between acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon was 0.84 (95%CI 0.79-0.89) and between acenocoumarol. and warfarin 1.85 (95%CI 1.78-1.92). Conclusions: We determined the transition factors between warfarin, phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol. With these transition factors physicians are able to estimate the maintenance dose when it is necessary for a patient to switch from one coumarin to the other. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据