4.6 Article

Serum albumin and risk of venous thromboembolism

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 100-104

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH09-12-0856

关键词

Albumin; prospective study; pulmonary embolism; venous thrombosis

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [R01 HL59367, N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55022, N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, U01 HL080295]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients with albuminuria. However, whether a low serum albumin concentration is associated with increased risk of VIE has been a matter of controversy. We determined the association of serum albumin with VTE incidence in two large, prospective, population-based cohorts: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study (n = 15,300) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) (n = 5,400). Validated VTE occurrence (n = 462 in ARIC and n = 174 in CHS) was ascertained during follow-up. In both studies, after adjustment for age, sex, race, use of hormone replacement therapy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, history of cancer, and diabetes, serum albumin tended to be associated inversely with VTE. The adjusted hazard ratio per standard deviation lower albumin was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.08, 1.31) in ARIC and 1.10 (95% Cl= 0.94, 1.29) in CHS.The hazard ratio for albumin below (vs. above) the fifth percentile was 1.28 (95% Cl = 0.90, 1.84) in ARIC and 1.80 (95% Cl = 1.11, 2.93) in CHS. In conclusion, low serum albumin was a modest marker of increased VTE risk. The observed association likely does not reflect cause and effect, but rather that low serum albumin reflects a hyperinflammatory or hypercoagulable state. Whether this association has clinical relevance warrants further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据