4.6 Article

Role of membrane cholesterol in platelet calcium signalling in response to VWF and collagen under stasis and flow

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 1068-1078

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH07-08-0528

关键词

collagen; von Willebrand factor; calcium; cholesterol-rich domains

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have highlighted a specific role for membrane cholesterol domains in platelet signalling. Upon adhesion to von Willebrand factor (VWF) or collagen, cholesterol-rich domains (CRDs) accumulate in filopodial extensions and selectively harbour counterpart receptors (GPIb and GPVI) and associated signalling molecules. In the present study we have addressed the role of membrane cholesterol in Ca2+ signalling and secretion during the interaction of platelets with VWF and collagen. VWF/ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation was delayed after treatment with methyl beta-cyclodextrin (mbCD), but the maximal aggregation response was not affected. Platelet spreading but not adhesion to immobilised VWF under flow was attenuated by cholesterol removal, and accompanied by moderate lowering in the spiking Ca2+ response. On the other hand, platelet interaction with collagen was quite sensitive to cholesterol depletion. Platelet aggregation decreased after treatment with mbCD, and Ca2+ responses were decreased, both under static and flow conditions. Cholesterol depletion affected the secondary feedback activation via release of thromboxane A(2) and ADP. The collagen-induced secretion of alpha granules and surface translocation of P-selectin and CD63 was also critically affected by cholesterol depletion. Confocal microscopy showed localization of p-Tyr at sites of contact with substrate and other platelets, where also CRDs accumulate. Our data thus reveal a more critical role for membrane cholesterol in collagen-induced than in VWF-incluced Ca2+ signalling,and furthermore support the concept that secondary activation responses are dependent on intact CRDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据