4.6 Article

Non-invasive phenotyping using exhaled volatile organic compounds in asthma

期刊

THORAX
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 804-809

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.156695

关键词

-

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Universiti Sains Malaysia
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10249] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be useful for asthma diagnosis and phenotyping, identifying patients who could benefit from personalised therapeutic strategies. The authors aimed to identify specific patterns of breath VOCs in patients with asthma and in clinically relevant disease phenotypes. Methods Breath samples were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The Asthma Control Questionnaire was completed, together with lung function and induced sputum cell counts. Breath data were reduced to principal components, and these principal components were used in multiple logistic regression to identify discriminatory models for diagnosis, sputum inflammatory cell profile and asthma control. Results The authors recruited 35 patients with asthma and 23 matched controls. A model derived from 15 VOCs classified patients with asthma with an accuracy of 86%, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.85 and 0.89, respectively. Models also classified patients with asthma based on the following phenotypes: sputum (obtained in 18 patients with asthma) eosinophilia >= 2% area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve 0.98, neutrophilia >= 40% AUROC 0.90 and uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire >= 1) AUROC 0.96. Conclusions Detection of characteristic breath VOC profiles could classify patients with asthma versus controls, and clinically relevant disease phenotypes based on sputum inflammatory profile and asthma control. Prospective validation of these models may lead to clinical application of non-invasive breath profiling in asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据